systemSleep

Post Reply
z.g
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:33 pm

systemSleep

Post by z.g » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:10 pm

\libnds\source\arm7\system.c:

Code: Select all

    //100ms
    swiDelay(838000);
\libnds\source\arm9\system.c:

Code: Select all

   //100ms
   swiDelay(419000);
logically arm9 two time faster so delay must be two times bigger for same delay. actually it smaller. so real delay on arm9 side — 25ms. so possible mistake here.

elhobbs
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:19 pm

Re: systemSleep

Post by elhobbs » Mon Apr 26, 2010 9:48 pm

I think the number is a loop counter not a direct meaurement of time

z.g
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:33 pm

Re: systemSleep

Post by z.g » Tue Apr 27, 2010 11:45 am

elhobbs wrote:I think the number is a loop counter not a direct meaurement of time
it is.

elhobbs
Posts: 358
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:19 pm

Re: systemSleep

Post by elhobbs » Tue Apr 27, 2010 2:02 pm

z.g wrote:
elhobbs wrote:I think the number is a loop counter not a direct meaurement of time
it is.
yeah, i guess that would support your point rather than disprove it.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 1 guest